WASHINGTON (AFP) – Donald Trump’s first White House term saw a trade conflict with China that left a lingering impact on farmers – and many are bracing for further fallout.
Trump tariffs since 2018 hit some USD300 billion of Chinese imports, sparking retaliation that targeted key farm products like soya beans and caused such exports to fall.
United States (US) farmers relied on subsidies to get by at the time and said China has since reduced its reliance on American agriculture products.
Trump has suggested tariffs on all imports this time – with an especially high rate on China – making many farm owners jittery of a return to trade tensions.
But this comes even as Trump’s Republican party saw wide support in rural areas during this year’s election, with many farmers supporting him despite the financial hit in the trade war.
The hope is for economic conditions to improve.
“There was no money to pay the bills, no money to actually have a living out of the operation,” said Ted Winter, whose farm in Minnesota grows corn and soya beans.
Retaliatory tariffs on the US caused more than USD27 billion in US agricultural export losses from mid-2018 to late-2019, the Department of Agriculture (USDA) found.
China accounted for around 95 per cent of value lost. Soya beans in particular made up nearly 71 per cent of total trade loss, with Brazil gaining most of the lost trade.
Michael Slattery, who grows crops like corn, soya beans and wheat in Wisconsin, added, “I view this second term with tremendous trepidation.”
Between 2017 and 2018 for example, his soya bean income fell by over USD25,000 – and government payouts to alleviate the pain made up for just over half the shortfall.
The USDA estimates agriculture and related industries contributed a 5.6-per cent share to GDP in 2023, while direct on-farm employment made up 2.6 million jobs as of recent years.
“What is more frightening is the breakdown in commercial order that has taken decades to establish,” Slattery said.
While US farm exports to China rebounded after Washington and Beijing reached a trade war truce in 2020, a year after the deal, American market share remained lower than levels seen before the retaliatory tariffs were enacted.
“The tariffs that were imposed upon China drove them to find other sources for their food needs,” said Winter. And without foreign buyers like China to absorb excess farm production, the market becomes oversaturated, in turn driving down prices and farmer incomes, said Slattery.
Federal payments may have been helpful to farmers during the trade war, but trade ramifications extended long beyond it, said American Soybean Association (ASA) chief economist Scott Gerlt.
Soya beans and corn will again be “prime targets for tariffs” in a potential trade dispute, according to a National Corn Growers Association and ASA report last month.
Both commodities account for about one-fourth of the country’s agriculture export value.
The report cautioned that many tariffs China imposed on US farm products have been given a waiver but could be reinstated – triggering an average drop of 51.8 per cent in US soya bean exports from expected levels.
Similarly, corn exports to China would also slide.
Brazil and Argentina, meanwhile, are expected to gain global market share with higher exports.
If the US was not a reliable trade partner, other nations would turn to other countries, said ASA’s Gerlt.
“We saw some other buyers step in to some extent, like Egypt did for a while, but there is no replacing the size of the Chinese market,” he told AFP.
Among tariff proposals Trump floated on the campaign trail, he warned that the US should be careful with trade policy, especially when it comes to countries that are major buyers of US agriculture.
