Saturday, September 21, 2024
31 C
Brunei Town

NZ says no plan to prosecute British DJ over COVID breach

WELLINGTON (AFP) – New Zealand’s government said yesterday it would not ask for British DJ Dimension to be prosecuted for breaking COVID isolation rules and creating an Omicron infection scare.

The electronic music artist, real name Robert Etheridge, said he had misunderstood the rules when he mixed with people before getting a final negative test result.

“The Ministry of Health does not plan to refer this case to the police at this stage,” the ministry said in a statement.

“The ministry needs to balance the deterrence effect from any potential prosecution with enabling an environment that does not discourage future cases from assisting with the public health response to COVID-19,” it said.

Etheridge said on Thursday he was “devastated” to discover that he had tested positive after emerging from 10 days of isolation including three days at his residence. The DJ failed to wait for a negative result from his last test taken on day nine of isolation before going out into the community.

Ho Chi Minh City issues quarantine procedure for arrivals in face of Omicron

HO CHI MINH CITY (VIETNAM NEWS/ANN) – Ho Chi Minh City’s People’s Committee issued urgent guidelines for a five-step quarantine procedure for arriving passengers amid the emergence of the Omicron variant in Vietnam.

According to the document, the self-quarantine area (including homes, hotels, offices, dormitories, guest houses) must meet the standards required by the Ministry of Health. If the accommodation fails to meet these criteria, incoming passengers will have to go into centralised quarantine facilities.

The document also states that passengers arriving in Vietnam at Tân Son Nhat International Airport must comply with a five-step procedure.

VIetnam so far has reported 20 Omicron infections, which were immediately quarantined upon arrival. Six of them have been given the all-clear after testing negative for coronavirus.

Visitors arrive at the Tân Son Nhat International Airport, Vietnam. PHOTO: VIETNAM NEWS/ANN

Ramsey Campbell is a must-read for horror fans and here’s where to start

Bill Sheehan

THE WASHINGTON POST – Ramsey Campbell, one of the premier horror writers of the English-speaking world, is now 75, and has recently entered his seventh decade as a published writer. This is quite literally true. His first book, a collection of Lovecraft-inspired tales called The Inhabitant of the Lake, appeared in 1964, when its fledgling author was still in his teens.

In the years since, he has produced a steady stream of novels, novellas and stories. Taken together, they constitute one of the monumental accomplishments of modern popular fiction.

Consider these numbers: To date, Campbell has published 37 novels, along with hundreds of short stories that have been collected in more than two dozen volumes.

He has also published one volume of verse, two massive collections of assorted nonfiction and has edited some 20 volumes of new and classic horror fiction. In terms of both quality and productivity, his career has been a remarkable one, and shows no signs of slowing down.

This year alone, Campbell has published three new books.

Ramsey Campbell, Certainly, a 600-page follow-up to 2002’s Ramsey Campbell, Probably, offers an assortment of autobiographical reflections, along with cogent commentary on such subjects as censorship, plagiarism, classic weird fiction and the ongoing influence of HP Lovecraft. This generous volume not only offers a glimpse into the mind behind the stories, but also serves as a curated guide to the best that horror has to offer, both in fiction and films.

The Village Killings and Other Novellas gathers all of Campbell’s work in the novella form. This collection of five stories and an essay leads with Needing Ghosts, arguably the author’s most disturbing and disorienting piece of fiction, and ends with the title story, a newly published tale that reveals an affinity – and affection – for the classic, Golden Age detective story.

(Another story, The Enigma of the Flat Policeman, was written under the influence of John Dickson Carr, master of the locked room mystery.) This is a strong, long overdue collection that offers a surprising glimpse into the range and variety of Campbell’s literary interests.

The final installment in this year’s Campbell trifecta is the novel Somebody’s Voice (Flame Tree Press). This is quite simply one of the best novels Campbell has ever written. The premise is simple.

Alex Grand, a crime novelist whose career has reached a crisis point, agrees to serve as ghost writer for Carl (formerly Carla) Batchelor, an embittered survivor of childhood abuse.

The act of collaboration reveals the fault lines in Alex’s carefully constructed version of his own past and leads to unexpected – and painful – revelations.

This is a beautifully structured novel that deals forthrightly with uncomfortable issues – abuse, gender politics, repressed memories – and moves steadily toward a conclusion that is both affecting and, in retrospect, inevitable.

Throughout his long career, Campbell has mastered the art of generating a sense of sustained unease. In book after book, he has created an instantly recogniszable world in which the most commonplace scenes, settings and objects assume a sinister, potentially menacing air.

It is a world in which – to contradict the title of one of Campbell’s finest novels – there is no safe place.

Against the backdrop of a harsh, often malleable reality, Campbell has created some of the most uncompromising horror fiction of recent decades.

Malaysian Jin Wei wants to remain as independent player for now

KUALA LUMPUR (BERNAMA) – Former World Junior Champion Goh Jin Wei said she will be playing as an independent player for the time-being, despite receiving an offer to rejoin the Badminton Association of Malaysia (BAM).

The 21-year-old Penang-born shuttler, who regretted her decision to abruptly quit the national team last year, said she couldn’t accept the offer because she was unable to give 100 per cent commitment and can’t fulfil the national team’s requirements due to health issues.

The singles gold medallist at the 2015 and 2018 World Junior Championship said she also didn’t want to take away other players’ opportunities by rejoining the national team now.

“I am deeply honoured to be invited to the national team, I can’t even begin to explain how much this means to me. I really wish to continue playing regardless of any level or status,” she said through a video uploaded in her YouTube page on Sunday.

“I would like to express my deepest thanks to the national team for having faith in me. For everything our BAM president Tan Sri Mohamad Norza Zakaria has done. I just want to let you know how thankful I am for your help and your kind words truly means a lot to me,” she added.

Malaysian shuttler Jin Wei. PHOTO: XINHUA

Freshers’ week for new UBD students

Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD) organised the UBD Freshers’ Week opening ceremony and Vice-Chancellor’s special address yesterday. The ceremony welcomed 356 students, including 172 undergraduates, 118 Masters, 172 PhD and 28 Unibridge students for the January 2021/2022 intake.

Acting Vice-Chancellor of UBD Pengiran Dr Mohammad Iskandar bin Pengiran Haji Petra, senior management team, staff, students and parents attended the virtual event.

Prior to the opening ceremony, the Pre-Freshers Week was held from December 18, 2021 to yesterday. New students were required to complete registration, payment of fees and purchase of insurance coverage.

New students will continue to attend briefings for four days from January 6 and 8 via CANVAS, Microsoft Teams and Zoom.

Among the important live sessions are Brunei Government scholarship, faculty briefing, module registration and examinations.

There will also be religious talks on Quranic Journey and Bicara Ulum.

Students will be also be given a sexual harassment awareness talk by Acting Head of Royal Brunei Police Force’s (RBPF) Women and Children Abuse Investigation Unit DSP Norkhatijah binti Haji Zainal and an HIV awareness programme for peers and youth (happy programme) organised by Legislative Council member and the President of Brunei Darussalam AIDS Council Yang Berhormat Iswandy bin Ahmad.

Freshers Week will end with a Bicara Ulum and Doa Selamat on January 8.

ABOVE & BELOW: Acting Vice-Chancellor of UBD Pengiran Dr Mohammad Iskandar bin Pengiran Haji Petra; and students during the opening ceremony. PHOTOS: UBD

Scientist, enforcer, high-flyer

WASHINGTON (AP) – Three bright and driven women with ground-breaking ideas made significant – if very different – marks on the embattled tech industry in 2021.

Frances Haugen, Lina Khan and Elizabeth Holmes – a data scientist turned whistleblower, a legal scholar turned antitrust enforcer and a former Silicon Valley high-flyer turned criminal defendant – all figured heavily in a technology world where men have long dominated the spotlight. Think Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk.

Haugen, a former product manager at Facebook, went public with internal documents to buttress accusations that the social network giant elevated profits over the safety of users.

At 32, Khan is the youngest person ever to lead the Federal Trade Commission, an agency now poised to aggressively enforce antitrust law against the tech industry.

Holmes, once worth USD4.5 billion on paper, is now awaiting a jury’s verdict on fraud charges that she misled investors and patients about the accuracy of a blood-testing technology developed at her startup Theranos.

Her story has become a Silicon Valley morality tale – a founder who flew too high, too fast – despite the fact that male tech executives have been accused of similar actions or worse without facing charges.

ABOVE & BELOW: Frances Haugen; Lina Khan; and Elizabeth Holmes. PHOTOS: AP

FRANCES HAUGEN

Haugen joined Facebook out of a desire to help it address misinformation and other threats to democracy.

But her frustration grew as she learned of online misinformation that stoked violence and abuse – and which Facebook wasn’t addressing effectively. So in the fall of 2021 the 37-year-old Haugen went public with a trove of Facebook documents that catalogued how her former employer was failing to protect young users from body-image issues and amplifying online hate and extremism.

Her work also laid bare the algorithms Big Tech uses to tailor content that will keep users hooked on its services.

“Frances Haugen has transformed the conversation about technology reform,” Roger McNamee, an early investor in Facebook who became one of its leading critics, wrote in Time magazine.

Facebook the company, which has since renamed itself Meta Platforms, has disputed Haugen’s assertions, although it hasn’t pointed to any factual errors in her public statements.

The company instead emphasises the vast sums it said it has invested in safety since 2016 and data showing the progress it’s made against hate speech, incitement to political violence and other social ills.

Haugen’s revelations energised global lawmakers seeking to rein in Big Tech, although there’s been little concrete action in the United States (US), Facebook rushed to change the subject by rolling out its new corporate name and playing up its commitment to developing an immersive technology platform known as the “metaverse”.

LINA KHAN

A similar dynamic prevailed for Khan, an academic outsider with big new ideas and a far-reaching agenda that ruffled institutional and business feathers.

US President Joe Biden stunned official Washington in June when he installed Khan, an energetic critic of Big Tech then teaching law, as head of the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

That signaled a tough government stance toward giants Meta, Google, Amazon and Apple.
Khan is the youngest chair in the 106-year history of the FTC, which polices competition, consumer protection and digital privacy.

She was an unorthodox choice, with no administrative experience or knowledge of the agency other than a brief 2018 stint as legal adviser to one of the five commissioners. But she brought intellectual heft that packed a political punch. Khan shook up the antitrust world in 2017 with her scholarly work as a Yale law student, Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox, which helped shape a new way of looking at antitrust law.

For decades, antitrust work has defined anticompetitive action as market dominance that drives up prices, a concept that doesn’t apply to many “free” technology services.

Khan instead pushed to examine the broader effects of corporate concentration on industries, employees and communities. That school of thought – dubbed “hipster antitrust” by its detractors – appears to have had a significant influence on Biden.

Under Khan’s six-month tenure, the FTC has sharpened its antitrust attack against Facebook in federal court and pursued a competition investigation into Amazon.

The agency sued to block graphics chip maker Nvidia’s USD40 billion purchase of chip designer Arm, saying a combined company could stifle the growth of new technologies.

In Khan’s aggressive investigations and enforcement agenda, key priorities include racial bias in algorithms and market-power abuses by dominant tech companies.

“She’s shaken things up,” said Robin Gaster, a visiting scholar at George Washington University who focuses on economics, politics and technology.

“She is going to be a field test for whether an aggressive FTC can expand the envelope for antitrust enforcement.”

ELIZABETH HOLMES

Holmes founded Theranos when she was 19, dropping out of Stanford to pursue a bold, humanitarian idea. Possessed of seemingly boundless networking chutzpah, Holmes touted Theranos blood-testing technology as a breakthrough that could scan for hundreds of medical conditions using just a few drops of blood.

By 2015, 11 years after leaving Stanford, Holmes had raised hundreds of millions of dollars for her company, pushing its market value to USD9 billion. Half of that belonged to Holmes, earning her the moniker of the world’s youngest self-made female billionaire at 30.

Just three years later, though, Theranos collapsed in scandal.

After a three-and-a-half-month federal trial, a jury now is weighing criminal fraud and conspiracy charges against Holmes for allegedly duping investors and patients by concealing the fact that the blood-testing technology was prone to wild errors.

If convicted, Holmes, now 37, faces up to 20 years in prison.

The Holmes trial has exposed Silicon Valley’s “fake it ‘til you make it” culture in painful detail.

Tech entrepreneurs often overpromise and exaggerate, so prosecutors faced the challenge of proving that Holmes’ boosterism crossed the line into fraud.

Six killed in al-Shabab attack in Kenya

LAMU, KENYA (XINHUA) – At least six villagers were killed yesterday in an attack by al-Shabab militants at a village in Kenya’s coastal county of Lamu, local officials said.

Lamu County Commissioner Irungu Macharia said that the attackers, believed to have crossed over from neighbouring Somalia, also torched several houses in the attack there.

“The security forces are pursuing the attackers,” Macharia said over phone, adding that one of the victims was shot dead, another was hacked to death and the other four were burnt to death in their house. Coast Regional Commander Manase Musyoka also confirmed the incident.

“My team has informed me of the attack and we are planning to go there to assess the situation. I am told six people died in the incident,” Musyoka told Xinhua over phone.

Security agencies said the militants had been sighted in the vast Boni forest, which is near the Somali border before the attack.

Residents said tensions remained high in the area amid fears of more attacks as security operations mounted.

464 new COVID-19 cases in Singapore

SINGAPORE (CNA) – Singapore reported 464 new COVID-19 cases as of noon yesterday, including 285 imported infections.

There were no fatalities, with the country’s death toll remaining at 829, according to the latest infection statistics on the Ministry of Health’s (MOH) website.

Yesterday’s case count was up from the 429 reported on Sunday.

Among the new cases reported yesterday, 179 were locally transmitted, comprising 177 in the community and two in migrant worker’s dormitories.

One hundred and eighty-seven new Omicron infections were confirmed yesterday, comprising 183 imported cases and four local cases.

The daily COVID-19 cases and new confirmed Omicron cases are presented as two separate sets of data on MOH’s website.

The weekly infection growth rate yesterday was 0.95, up from Sunday’s 0.92. This refers to the ratio of community cases for the past week over the week before.

This is the 10th consecutive day the weekly infection growth rate has increased.

The rate has remained below one since November 13, indicating that the number of new weekly COVID-19 cases is falling.

As of yesterday, Singapore has recorded 280,754 COVID-19 cases since the start of the pandemic.

How to help your child know when to ‘tattle’

Kelly Hoover Greenway

THE WASHINGTON POST – Recently, my six and 10-year-old sons were playing basketball in our driveway.

While this should have been time for me to enjoy a peaceful, quiet house, my younger child soon came barreling through the front door with an urgent question.

“Mom, is it true? Do snitches really get stitches?!”

It ends up, his brother learned this refrain not from another kid, but from a counsellor at his summer camp, and of course passed it along to his brother.

My older son explained, when I pressed him, that the counsellor encouraged campers to work things out among themselves instead of reporting all their skirmishes to an adult.

This left me feeling rather torn.

I agree that children must learn how to handle peer conflict in mature ways. However, this idea that reporting information to an adult automatically equates to “snitching” or being a “tattletale” dismisses the important role trusted grown-ups can play in helping kids and teens navigate complicated situations.

No, we don’t want our children running to us every time they feel slighted or want to get a peer (or sibling) in trouble.

But when we infer that speaking up will jeopardise their relationships with their friends, we risk losing a vital line of communication between parent and child- one that becomes even more important as they grow older.

It’s a tricky issue to navigate for both kids and their caregivers, due in no small part to our tendency to send mixed messages with regard to this topic. When our children are young we teach them the rules: no hitting, no biting, treat others the way you want to be treated.

But as soon as they report that someone else isn’t playing by those rules we said, “No one likesa tattletale.”

This does not elicit trust from our little ones.

“It’s important for parents and caregivers to understand that children want support, but (once they start school) they are now part of the bigger world, so they don’t want to break those social contracts either,” said Los Angeles-based parenting coach and early childhood consultant Joshua Castillo. If we want our kids to feel safe giving us information, it’s crucial we establish early on what our help will look like when they do.

“Help doesn’t mean the adult is going to save you. Your role is to help the kid think it through and understand their options (for problem-solving),” Castillo said.

She called this “deconstructing the context” and urges parents to resist pitting one child against another by asking things like, “Who made you feel bad?”

Instead, she suggests going back to the initial point of connection (what they were doing at the time) and then figure out where the disconnect (not the “wrong”) occurred.

“If your kids get accustomed to you saying, ‘I can see that situation got tricky. Let’s play it back. How did it all start?’ they will give you more details to work with.”

In doing this, she explained children won’t feel scared to confide in you because you’ve coached them early on to see you as a reliable source.

As our children grow so do their bonds with friends, which can make the stakes higher for revealing information to the grown-ups in their life. Pinkie promises, being sworn to secrecy, and the threat of “stitches” all lead to an internal conflict: to tell or not to tell?

Judging by the statistics, when it comes to peer conflict such as bullying, most of our children are choosing not to talk. Executive Director for American Society for the Positive Care of Children (SPCC) Genevieve Rivera reported that only a tiny percentage of children who are being bullied tell their caregivers. Somewhat surprisingly though, young people cite fear of parental repercussions, not necessarily those of their friends, as one of the main reasons they don’t want to share their struggles.

Rivera noted that children (yes, even the ones who are being bullied) worry they’ll have their phone taken away or be told they can’t play with a particular person anymore.

Because of this, she said caregivers must “be the calm in the chaos” if their children tell them about bullying or other upsetting behaviors taking place.

Castillo agreed, noting that the challenging situations our kids find themselves in may repeat – with the same or different characters – and we should be honest about that without letting our emotions take over or making anyone else a villain.

“Even if your kid had a really hard experience I’d say, ‘So this might come up again, let’s talk it through’.“

Of course, bullying isn’t the only issue young people feel nervous reporting to grown-ups.
Castillo cited a time when her daughter’s friend came out to her daughter, but told her not to tell anyone. She explained to her daughter, “Your friend told you that because it’s their way of saying, ‘I don’t want other people to know because this is so delicate,’ and she doesn’t know if you have a parent who is going to run and tell everyone.”

She stated parents can secure for their children how they will show up for this kind of information by letting them know, “I’m a parent who is going to talk it through with you, and we’ll wonder, we’ll ask questions together, and maybe I’ll give you some strategies to help support your friend, but that’s it. I’m not the kind of grown-up who is going to talk.”

Deviating from this, she cautions, may result in your child “not signing a higher-level contract with you”.

Kids know when there’s a parent revealing information that has been deemed private among their peers. I saw this firsthand when I asked my son about an issue at school he didn’t think I knew about. “When there’s a leak,” Castillo warned, “everyone becomes petrified of sharing.

And your kid is going to FBI background check you to make sure you aren’t the one responsible.”

One strategy Castillo recommended for maintaining open lines of communication while also respecting your child’s need for privacy is to create an “idea jar” where everyone in the family writes down tricky situations they’d like to discuss.

No one gives specific names or whether a situation is real or hypothetical, but it gives the family a chance to sit down together, discuss, and play out a number of different scenarios in which support might be needed.

It’s entirely possible to imagine a relationship with our kids where this topic isn’t binary: either they talk to us or they solve issues on their own.

If we can remember our role is to support, not solve, and we show up as reliable, trustworthy sources, then perhaps a new scenario can emerge – one where snitches no longer need to get stitches.

Race heats up in quest for Formula 1’s new owner

BOURNEMOUTH, ENGLAND (CNA) – The Formula One duel between Lewis Hamilton and Max Verstappen was resolved in sensational – and controversial – style on the final lap of the last race of 2021.

The Dutch driver snatched victory and the world title from his British rival at the end of what was widely considered one of the best seasons in the sport’s history.

It seems clear from the close finish that Formula One is in rude health on the track. It is also attracting large viewing figures – which could in turn attract fresh financial interest in owning the sport.

Currently at the wheel is the US media giant Liberty Media, which also has interests in baseball, broadcasting, film production and sport management.

It bought Formula One for USD4.6 billion in 2017 from the previous owners, CVC Capital Partners.

But just two years later, in 2019, there were rumours that Liberty was already considering selling up.

The rumours, denied by Liberty, came amid concerns about falling fan numbers and the challenge of increasing the appeal of Formula One to a younger audience.

Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton of Britain in the lead at the start of the Formula One Abu Dhabi Grand Prix in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, on December 12, 2021. PHOTO: AP

NEW-FOUND INTEREST

After a recent decline in TV audience figures (they dropped from 1.9 billion to 1.5 billion from 2019 to 2020), Formula One’s profile has been significantly enhanced.

During the 2021 season, the global TV audience for the first nine races increased by 36 per cent compared to 2019.

And in 2020 there was a 99 per cent increase in social media engagements recorded across Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube – the largest increase for any professional sport, and a clear indication that younger fans were showing interest. This marked increase in popularity – especially in the US – is likely to be at least in part down to the success of the Netflix documentary series Drive to Survive, which has become one of the streaming giant’s most-watched shows.

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings also counts himself a fan of Formula One, suggesting that if Liberty were considering selling, he would be willing to make an offer.

He explained in an interview in September, “A few years back, the Formula 1 rights were sold. At that time we were not among the bidders, but today we would definitely consider that now.”

There may be other jostling for position too, not least the bidders who lost out to Liberty five years ago.

That bid was submitted by Qatar (through the Qatari Sports Investment fund, a part of the country’s sovereign wealth fund) in partnership with the American billionaire Stephen Ross, who owns the Miami Dolphins American football team.

POLE POSITION?

Far from losing their appetite for Formula One after they lost out to Liberty, both parties are now firmly embedded in the sport. Qatar staged its first race in November 2021, and has signed up for nine more (with a break in 2022 while it hosts the Fifa World Cup).

Next season will also see the first Miami Grand Prix in May, which will be held at the Miami International Autodrome. The Floridian track weaves around the Hard Rock Stadium’s real estate, which just happens to be the home of the Miami Dolphins. So could Qatar, Ross or Netflix be tempted to pounce? Certainly the numbers look enticing too.

Earlier this year Liberty’s shares were reported to be up 113 per cent since they acquired the sport, and revenue was up at USD180 million for the first quarter of 2021, from just USD39 million in 2020.

Confidence in the financial value of the sport is high with McLaren Racing’s CEO Zak Brown recently pointing out, “Liberty are sports investors in amongst investing in lots of businesses … they could really uncork the potential value of the sport.”

Back in 2020, Bernie Ecclestone, former chief executive of CVC’s Formula One Group, had cautioned that a business that gives the impression that it is doing well might be creating the right climate for a profitable sale. He said, “I would do the same if I wanted to sell.”

Whether they do intend to sell after one of Formula One’s most exciting seasons in recent years remains to be seen. Interest is up, viewing figures are up, and the start of the 2022 season is already an enticing prospect.