Saturday, May 18, 2024
32 C
Brunei Town

Myanmar’s Suu Kyi testifies in election fraud trial

BANGKOK (AP) – Ousted Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi denied the accusations in an election fraud charge against her when she testified for the first time on the case yesterday at the prison court in the capital Naypyitaw, a legal official said.

The army seized power from Suu Kyi’s elected government in February last year, claiming massive voting fraud in the 2020 general election, an allegation not corroborated by independent election observers.

Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy party won that election in a landslide, while the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party did poorly.

A conviction in the election fraud case could lead to Suu Kyi’s party being dissolved and unable to participate in a new election the military has promised will take place in 2023.

Suu Kyi has already been sentenced to 11 years in prison after being convicted on charges of illegally importing and possessing walkie-talkies, violating coronavirus restrictions, sedition and a corruption charge.

Ousted Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi. PHOTO: AP

Suu Kyi’s supporters and independent analysts said the charges are politically motivated and an attempt to discredit her and legitimize the military’s seizure of power while keeping her from returning to politics. Suu Kyi is being tried for multiple charges at a new facility constructed in the prison compound in the capital Naypyitaw, including the electoral fraud charge.

She was transferred from a secret detention location to a custom-built solitary facility at a prison in Naypyitaw last month.

The penalty for the offence is three years’ imprisonment. Former President Win Myint and former Union Government Office Minister Min Thu are co-defendants in the case.

The election fraud charge was filed in November by the state Election Commission, whose members were appointed by the military government.

The military dismissed the commission’s previous members, who had declared there were no major irregularities in the election.

The new commission accused the defendants, including its own former chairman, of being “involved in electoral processes, election fraud and lawless actions”.