WASHINGTON (AFP) – It’s often said that people who click right away share “chemistry”.
This expression could be true in the literal sense, according to a new study published in the journal Science Advances last Friday, which finds people with similar body odours are more likely to hit it off as friends. “Non-human terrestrial mammals constantly sniff themselves and each other and, based on this, decide who is friend or foe,” wrote a group of researchers led by Inbal Ravreby at Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel.
Since people seek friends who are similar to themselves, the team hypothesised that humans may smell themselves and others to subconsciously estimate body odour similarity and judge their compatibility.
To find out, they set about collecting samples from pairs of same-sex, non-romantic friends who described themselves as having clicked at first sight, that is to say “where a sense of friendship was formed before extensive biographical information was exchanged”, according to the paper.
After an extensive recruitment effort, they found 20 pairs, half of whom were male, and the other half female, all aged between 22 and 39 years old.
In order to prevent contamination or outside factors influencing their samples, all participants had to follow a strict protocol that included avoiding pungent foods and sleeping away from their partner and pets in a clean cotton T-shirt that was provided to them.
The T-shirts were collected in ziplock bags and tested with an electronic nose – a device equipped with sensors to analyse chemical composition. The researchers found that the odour signatures of “click friends” were statistically more closely matched than odours between non-friends.
To assess whether the eNose results accurately mirrored human perception, the team recruited human smellers and devised a set of tests to check the validity of their result.
In one of these tests, for example, the human smellers were presented with three odours: two from a pair of click friends, and one outlier. They successfully identified the pairs and rejected the outlier.
These results seemed to confirm the hypothesis that similar smells might spur friendship, but an alternative explanation was that people who are friends spend a lot of time together and so have similar body-odour shaping experiences, such as where they live and what they eat.
To disentangle these two possibilities, the team devised another test to see whether smell could be a successful predictor in whether two people who’ve never met go on to click.
They recruited 17 strangers and had them all interact with one another in a test called the ‘Mirror Game’ – standing half a metre apart so they could subconsciously smell each other, they were asked to mimic each other’s hand movements for two minutes, without talking to each other.
Chemical similarity in their odours, as tested by the eNose, successfully predicted mutual clicks in 77 per cent of cases, and predicted 68 per cent of cases where both sides said they did not click.
What’s more, the closer people’s smell was, the more they reported liking each other, understanding one another, and feeling greater chemistry between themselves. Together, the study’s results “converged to suggest that human same-sex non-romantic click friends smell more similar to each other than expected by chance”, the team concluded.