Sunday, February 25, 2024
29 C
Brunei Town

EU can withhold funds from Hungary, Poland

BRUSSELS (AP) – The European Union’s (EU) highest court ruled yesterday that the 27-nation bloc can suspend support payments to member states if they breach rule of law principles, and dismissed a challenge by Hungary and Poland.

The right-wing governments of both nations had argued that such action lacked a proper legal basis. Both nations, large recipients of EU funds, have come under increasing criticism over the past few years for veering away from the Western principles of the respect for democratic values in their nations.

“The Court dismisses the actions brought by Hungary and Poland in their entirety,” the European Court of Justice said in a statement.

The ruling was hotly anticipated by many who had accused the two nations of democratic backsliding and had seen the linkage measure as the EU’s most potent weapon to prevent a democratic legitimacy rift deepening within the bloc.

When it comes to democratic principles, “the EU must be able to defend those values, within the limits of its powers”, the court said.

Judges preside over a hearing at the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg. PHOTO: AP

The EU’s executive Commission said it would await the ruling before committing on whether to withhold funds but its president Ursula von der Leyen immediately welcomed the ruling.

“The Commission will defend the Union’s budget against breaches of the principles of the rule of law. We will act with determination,” Von der Leyen promised.

Hungary’s reaction was swift. Justice Minister Judit Varga slammed the ruling on her Facebook page, calling it a “political judgement” and proof that the EU was abusing its power.

Both Hungary and Poland have in the past reasoned that the court was overstepping its authority in approving a new mechanism that is not described in the EU’s own treaties.

They said making such a link between finances and the legal decisions of independent member states amounted to blackmail from Brussels.

The court argued however that democratic backsliding had not only a political impact but also affected budgetary matters.

“The sound financial management of the Union budget and the financial interests of the Union may be seriously compromised by breaches of the principles of the rule of law committed in a member state,” it said.