SINGAPORE (AP) – The most tangible outcome of yesterday’s summit between President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un appeared to be a commitment to recover the remains of United States (US) military personnel missing in action and presumed dead from the Korean War.
In a joint statement signed by the leaders, the countries committed to the recovery of the remains and the immediate repatriation of those already identified.
The statement was otherwise filled with vague aspirational vows for peace and the denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula. Washington and Pyongyang agreed to hold follow-up talks at the “earliest possible date” between US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and a relevant high North Korean official.
Nearly 7,800 US troops remain unaccounted for from the 1950-53 war. About 5,300 were lost in North Korea.
It’s debatable whether North Korea’s commitment to recovering US war remains could count as a major win for Washington when Pyongyang would be simply returning to what it had been doing for years. Between 1996 and 2005, joint US-North Korea military search teams conducted 33 joint recovery operations and recovered 229 sets of American remains.
But efforts to recover and return the remains have been stalled for more than a decade because of the North’s development of nuclear weapons and US claims that the safety of recovery teams it sent during the administration of President George W Bush was not sufficiently guaranteed.
According to the Pentagon’s Defence POW/MIA Accounting Agency, most of the missing Americans died in major battles or as prisoners of war. Others died along the wayside or in small villages. Many of the losses from aircraft crashes also occurred near battle zones or roads connecting them.
North Korea and the US remain technically at war because the fighting ended with an armistice, not a peace treaty. Washington officially broke off the programme because it claimed the safety of its searchers was not guaranteed, though the North’s first nuclear test, in 2006, was likely a bigger reason. Critics of the programme also argued the North was using the deal to squeeze cash out of Washington, calling it “bones for bucks”.