Pentagon sees Taleban deal as allowing fuller focus on China

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration’s peace deal with the Taleban opens the door for an initial American troop withdrawal that United States (US) Defense Secretary Mark Esper sees as a step toward the broader goal of preparing for potential future war with China.

Esper has his eye on “great power competition,” which means staying a step ahead of China and Russia on battlefields of the future, including in space and in next-generation strategic weapons like hypersonic missiles and advanced nuclear weapons. He sees China in particular as a rising threat to American predominance on the world stage.

To do more to prepare for the China challenge, Esper wants to do less in Afghanistan, Iraq and other places. It’s less about moving troops directly to Asia from elsewhere in the world, and more about reducing commitments in lower-priority regions so that more military units can train together at home on skills related to conventional warfare. Predecessors in the Pentagon have had similar hopes, only to be drawn back to crises in the greater Middle East. In the past year alone, the US has sent an extra 20,000 troops to the Middle East, mainly due to worries about Iran.

With US President Donald Trump’s emphasis on ending America’s wars against extremists and insurgents, including in Afghanistan, Esper wants to bring home as many troops as he thinks he prudently can so they can prepare for “high end” warfare.

Policy Analyst and a Columbia University Professor of International and Public Affairs Stephen Biddle is sceptical that the Pentagon will be able to fully shift away from Afghanistan and other regional hot spots like Iraq, recalling that the Obama administration tried the same thing — also with China’s rise in mind — in the 2011-2014 period.

“The trouble was the Islamic State (IS) burst onto the scene,” in Iraq and Syria, Biddle said in an interview, and “lo and behold it was right back to a focus on the Middle East and small wars.”

In remarks last Saturday in Kabul, Esper kept the focus on prospects for a complete US withdrawal, while cautioning that the US “will not hesitate” to strike what he called terrorist threats in Afghanistan if the Taleban falters in its promise to prevent extremist groups to use Afghan soil to launch attacks on the homelands of the US or its allies.

“We still have a long way to go,” Esper said.

Reducing US troops levels in Afghanistan to zero is “our ultimate objective,” he said, but added that it will take “many months.”

Late last year, Esper said he would be willing to reduce troop levels even if no deal could be made with the Taleban.

“I would like to do that because what I want to do is reallocate forces to” the Asia-Pacific region, he said at the Ronald Reagan National Defense Forum in December last year. He said he wants to do the same thing in the Mideast, Africa and Europe.

“All of these places where I can free up troops where I could either bring them home to allow them to rest and refit and retrain or/and then reallocate them (to the Asia-Pacific region) to compete with the Chinese, to reassure our allies, to conduct exercises and training,” he said.