New York City wrestles with surge of violent police clashes

NEW YORK (AP) – A surge in violent police clashes has left a trail of bodies across New York City, stoking tensions between officers and critics who say they have been too quick to use deadly force.

Since mid-October, New York Police Department officers have shot five people, killing four of them – a torrent that left department veterans struggling to recall another time there were so many on-duty shootings in the city in such a short span.

On October 23, police killed a man in Harlem after they say he fired a gunshot that hit an officer’s bullet-resistant vest. Two days later, police killed a man in Brooklyn after they say he slammed an officer’s head with a chair. That officer was placed in a medically induced coma for several days.

Adding to the chasm: bystander video that showed a white police officer punching a black teen during a brawl on a Brooklyn subway platform. Hundreds of people last weekend marched in protest and the family of one teen said it will sue.

Why the sudden uptick in confrontations between police and the public? It depends on who you ask.

New York police and other emergency personnel investigate the scene of a shooting at a nail salon in the Brownsville neighbourhood of the Brooklyn borough of New York. PHOTO: AP

In law enforcement circles, there’s a growing feeling that people are feeling emboldened to act out against police officers. In a series of attacks over the summer, several officers were soaked with water , others were hit with a milk carton and Chinese food and another had his body camera ripped off.

Police unions said frequent criticism of police from city politicians and reform advocates is stoking anti-police sentiment.

The city’s largest police union, the Police Benevolent Association, said a lack of support from police leaders has left officers feeling isolated and abandoned, exemplified by the decision in August to fire an officer in the 2014 chokehold death of Eric Garner.

And the unions said reluctance by some judges and prosecutors to put suspects in jail, coupled with criminal justice reforms, such as the elimination of bail for most non-violent felonies on January 1, will make it harder for officers to keep the streets and themselves safe.

“The message is that there are no consequences for your actions,” said Joseph Giacalone, a former NYPD sergeant who now teaches at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

“You’re a victim and you’re a victim of society and you’re a victim of racism. And the police are the enemy because they are the tool they use to oppress you. That’s basically the message that has been filtered down.” Reform advocates see it differently. They argue the police have been provoking some of the recent flashes of violence with aggressive tactics, such as arresting people for jumping subway turnstiles and running down people suspected of carrying guns.

Public defender and police critic Rebecca Kavanagh pointed to the September 29 friendly fire death of Officer Brian Mulkeen, which she said would not have happened had officers not chased a man who ran away when they approached him.

Mulkeen, part of an anti-crime unit tasked with removing guns from the streets, was wrestling with the man, 27-year-old Antonio Williams, and could be heard on body-camera footage yelling, “He’s reaching for it! He’s reaching for it!” before his fellow officers opened fire.

Director of Communities United for Police Reform Joo-Hyun Kang said laws keeping disciplinary files secret and the outsized power of the NYPD and unions are enabling police officers to use deadly force with little or no consequence.

“Police violence isn’t new, but abusive and violent policing is out of control in New York City,” said Director of the watchdog group, which advocated for the firing of all officers in Garner’s death, Kang.

Police officials noted that some of the people shot by officers had criminal records or prior police interactions, but Kavanagh said those details can work to demonise a person and make it seem like shooting them was justified.