ANN/THE KOREA HERALD – Major South Korean internet service provider SK Broadband Co said it will end a yearslong legal battle over network usage fees against United States (US) streaming giant Netflix.
“We agreed to withdraw all disputes in the interests of the greater success of both companies, reflecting the common intention of putting values on customers first,” an SK Broadband official said yesterday without giving details of the agreement. “But our position on the necessity of network usage fees remains unchanged.”
The latest breakthrough comes almost three years after the two companies clashed over network usage fees, a thorny issue globally amid massive traffic triggered by streaming services like Netflix and YouTube.
For years, SK Broadband had asked Netflix to pay network usage fees, accusing the US firm of “free-riding” on its network, while Netflix refused to do so, citing net neutrality, which refers to the principle that internet service providers must treat all international communications equally regardless of content, platform or type of equipment.
The dispute also gained global attention as it was a battle over who is responsible for maintaining network quality. Launching the legal fight three years ago, SK Broadband claimed the amount of traffic generated by Netflix surged about 24 times from 50 gigabits per second (Gbps) in May 2018 to 1,200 Gbps in September 2021 amid the popularity of a slew of hit series.
Netflix also fought back by filing a suit against the Korean firm, asking a local court to confirm that it has no obligation to pay network usage fees.
In June 2021, the Seoul Central District Court ruled in favour of the Korean company, saying that it is “reasonable” for Netflix to provide something in return for the service. Netflix appealed against the decision a month after, arguing that the ruling may “topple the global internet ecosystem,” and the lawsuit had been pending.
Local industry sources and market watchers evaluate the sudden end of the legal battle as “somewhat expected.” Since SK Broadband and Netflix had been locked in a lawsuit for years without narrowing their differences, both firms must have felt a sense of fatigue, they said.
“It would have been disadvantageous for SK Broadband to be the only IPTV operator that could not provide the Netflix service, and as global telecom operators are demanding network usage fees from content providers, the precedent on network usage fees will be solidified for Netflix as well. It must have been a burden to be able to do so,” an industry official told The Korea Herald on the condition of anonymity.
“Netflix, on the other hand, may have felt the pressure as the precedent for network usage fees became solidified amid global telecom companies demanding fees from content providers.”
However, some industry insiders, expressed disappointment that no clear conclusion has been made by a court on the controversial issue. The Korea Telecommunications Operations Association, an organisation representing local telecom service providers, also said, there are still many problems to be solved in the industry.
They called for the need for legislation regarding the imposition of network usage fees, pointing to how Big Tech firms, including Google and YouTube, do not pay fees to domestic internet service providers, unlike IT firms like Naver.
“Instead of legal judgements, invisible agreements have been reached between the two companies,” said another industry source.
