22.7 C
Tuesday, July 5, 2022
22.7 C
Tuesday, July 5, 2022
    - Advertisement -
    - Advertisement -

    Meet the New York couple donating millions to the anti-vax movement

    |     Lena H Sun & Amy Brittain     |

    A WEALTHY Manhattan couple has emerged as significant financiers of the anti-vaccine movement, contributing more than USD3 million in recent years to groups that stoke fears about immunisations online and at live events – including two forums this year at the epicentre of measles outbreaks in New York’s ultra-Orthodox Jewish community.

    Hedge fund manager and philanthropist Bernard Selz and his wife, Lisa, have long donated to organisations focussed on the arts, culture, education and the environment. But seven years ago, their private foundation embraced a very different cause: groups that question the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.

    How the Selzes came to support anti-vaccine ideas is unknown, but their financial impact has been enormous. Their money has gone to a handful of determined individuals who have played an outsize role in spreading doubt and misinformation about vaccines and the diseases they prevent. The groups’ false claims linking vaccines to autism and other ailments, while downplaying the risks of measles, have led growing numbers of parents to shun the shots. As a result, health officials have said, the potentially deadly disease has surged to at least 1,044 cases this year, the highest number in nearly three decades.

    The Selz Foundation provides roughly three-fourths of the funding for the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), a three-year-old charity that describes its mission as promoting drug and vaccine safety and parental choice in vaccine decisions.

    Lisa Selz serves as the group’s president, but its public face and chief executive is Del Bigtree, a former daytime television show producer who draws big crowds to public events. Bigtree has no medical credentials but holds himself out as an expert on vaccine safety and promotes the idea that government officials have colluded with the pharmaceutical industry to cover up grievous harms from the drugs. In recent weeks, Bigtree has headlined forums in ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities in Brooklyn and Rockland County, New York, both areas confronting large measles outbreaks.

    “They should be allowed to have the measles if they want the measles,” Del Bigtree told reporters outside an anti-vaccine forum in Brooklyn earlier this month geared to the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community
    A woman attends the anti-vaccine forum in Brooklyn, where several hundred measles cases have been confirmed this year

    “They should be allowed to have the measles if they want the measles,” Bigtree told reporters outside the Brooklyn meeting on June 4. “It’s crazy that there’s this level of intensity around a trivial childhood illness.”

    Thanks largely to the Selzes’s donations, ICAN is now the best-funded among a trio of organisations that have amplified concerns about vaccines. ICAN brought in USD1.4 million in revenue in 2017, with just over USD1 million supplied by the Selz Foundation, according to tax filings.

    The Selzes and the groups they support are hardly the only purveyors of anti-vaccine ideas. Environmental attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a nephew of the late president, runs the Children’s Health Defense, a charity that promotes a similar agenda; it brought in USD727,000 in 2017, according to tax filings. Barbara Loe Fisher, who says her son was injured by vaccines, runs a Virginia-based non-profit that combats legislative efforts to tighten vaccine requirements. Her group, the National Vaccine Information Center, brings in about USD1 million a year, according to its 2018 tax documents.

    Though they are separately organised, the three groups reinforce one another’s efforts. Kennedy and Bigtree often appear together at public events, while ICAN’s website includes a link to Fisher’s group. Bigtree’s weekly livestream broadcast, which ICAN promotes, frequently features Kennedy.

    New York City Health Commissioner Oxiris Barbot, who has battled the nation’s single worst measles outbreak since October, said she never heard of the Selzes. “But I do know the science and the science is clear – the MMR vaccine prevents measles,” she said, using the common acronym for the vaccine that prevents measles, mumps and rubella. “Any suggestion to the contrary is a threat to the health and well-being of New Yorkers.”

    The Selzes did not respond to emails or phone messages. A woman who answered the telephone at the couple’s home on Manhattan’s Upper East Side declined to identify herself. “There’s nothing to say,” she said before hanging up.

    Bernard Selz, 79, has more than 40 years experience in the securities industry and runs Selz Capital, a hedge fund that holds a portfolio valued at more than USD500 million, according to recent filings from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Lisa Pagliaro Selz, 68, worked for Manufacturers Hanover Trust and Tiffany and Co Since 1993, she has helped manage the Selz Foundation “with a focus on humanitarian, educational, geriatric, homeopathic, animal causes and the arts,” according to a news release issued by LaGuardia Community College Foundation, where she was a board member from 2011 to 2016.

    The Selzes’ sons – both young adults – declined to comment. Friends and family members reached by The Washington Post said they were unable to shed light on the Selzes’ philanthropic choices.

    “This is a topic we don’t discuss,” said Marilyn Skony Stamm, a business executive and close friend of Lisa Selz. “We have differing opinions.” Stamm declined to elaborate, except to say that she values her friendship with the Selzes, whom she called “an incredibly philanthropic family.”

    Tax filings for the couple’s charitable foundation show they began supporting the movement in 2012, when they gave USD200,000 to a legal fund for Andrew Wakefield, one of the most important anti-vaccine activists.

    Wakefield, a former gastroenterologist, rose to fame in 1998 after publishing a paper in The Lancet, a respected British medical journal, that linked the MMR vaccine to autism in eight children. An investigation by Britain’s General Medical Council, which regulates doctors, found Wakefield guilty of professional misconduct in 2010 and revoked his license. The panel concluded that Wakefield had financial and ethical conflicts of interest, and had acted “dishonestly and irresponsibly.” Twelve years after the study’s publication, the Lancet retracted it.

    Wakefield declined to comment for this report. He has repeatedly denied wrongdoing and said he was motivated by children’s suffering.

    “You have probably heard in the newspapers and elsewhere that I am guilty of scientific fraud,” Wakefield said via Skype to a forum this spring in Rockland, New York. “And I want to reassure you that I have never been involved in scientific fraud. What happened to me is what happens to doctors who threaten the bottom line of the pharmaceutical companies.”

    By 2012, Wakefield had moved to Austin, Texas, where supporters began raising money for the Dr Wakefield Justice Fund, an effort to sue the journalists who had questioned Wakefield’s findings. The fund was “established by friends and supporters to respond to false claims made against Dr Wakefield; expose the corrupting influence of special interest groups behind these allegations and protect Dr Wakefield’s work from both profit- and politically-motivated censorship and retribution,” an archived version of the fund’s website says.

    Wakefield’s lawsuit was unsuccessful, but the Selz Foundation found other ways to support his work. After he launched two non-profits in 2014, the Selz Foundation donated USD1.6 million to the groups over the next several years, according to tax records. One, the AMC Foundation, was registered as a public charity to fund documentaries about public health issues. The other was a Texas non-profit corporation.

    Wakefield used the money to help fund a documentary film called Vaxxed, which details his allegations about a government cover-up of vaccine dangers. After filming, he and other producers traveled the country in a black Vaxxed bus that stopped at churches, libraries and chiropractors’ offices to record interviews with parents who believe their children had been injured by vaccines.

    “Virtually every dollar in this film to date has been donated by a handful of brave parents and philanthropists,” the “Vaxxed” website says. In the credits, the film lists the Selz Foundation first among 16 donors who financed the production.

    The film also introduced a new face to the anti-vax movement: Bigtree. Once a television producer of “The Doctors,” a daytime talk show filmed in Hollywood, Bigtree signed on to co-produce the film, which was released in 2016.

    Tara Smith, an infectious disease expert at Kent State University who has researched the anti-vaccine movement, called the film “an effective piece of propaganda” that uses “heart-wrenching stories of children supposedly harmed by vaccination.”

    For example, one mother featured in the film said her son developed autism after he was inadvertently given a double dose of the MMR vaccine. Filmmakers provided no medical documentation to support the claim, and the mother has said publicly that her son’s medical records were stolen from her apartment.

    The stories in the film “frequently fall apart when scrutinised,” Smith said.

    Bigtree said the film’s critics are “spreading misinformation” unless they “have proof that the exact stories of vaccine injury by the parents that appear in Vaxxed are false.”

    Since the publication of Wakefield’s Lancet paper, 21 studies have investigated vaccines and autism. None has found evidence of a link. The latest and largest study published this spring involved 657,461 Danish children born between 1999 and 2010. Experts note the first symptoms of autism often appear when children are about 12 months old – the same age they receive their first MMR shot – leading many parents to blame vaccines.

    Last year, Wakefield dissolved the two non-profits, according to Texas business filings and Wakefield’s co-founder, Polly Tommey. During its brief life, the AMC Foundation doled out grants exclusively to Autism Media Channel LLC, a private company that was also run by Wakefield, Tommey and a third partner, according to tax filings.

    According to the filings, the grants supported an educational film project.

    Attorney Marc Owens, a former head of the IRS division responsible for monitoring tax-exempt organisations, said the arrangement is “a very suspicious transaction.”

    “They transferred all of their income, it appears – with the exception of a small amount – to, basically, themselves,” Owens said. “It is extremely unusual to see this sort of expenditure from a public charity.”

    In an interview, Tommey defended the transactions.

    “Everything was cleared legally, and we stuck to our mission,” she said.

    Tommey said she is now focussed on the upcoming release of a sequel to Vaxxed that will include information about Gardasil, a vaccine that protects against several strains of the human papillomavirus. Wakefield, meanwhile, has launched another public charity to fund educational film projects, according to tax filings.

    The same year “Vaxxed” was released, Bigtree established the Informed Consent Action Network. The Selz Foundation donated USD100,000 that first year – 83 per cent of the charity’s funding, according to tax records.

    As Bigtree became a leader within the movement, donations from the Selzes grew: In 2017, the foundation boosted its contribution to more than USD1 million – 74 per cent of ICAN’s total revenue.

    Tax filings show the charity spent more than USD600,000 that year on legal fees. In 2018, the organisation filed Freedom of Information Act lawsuits against federal agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Health and Human Services. The suits sought to compel release of data and documents related to vaccine safety.

    Another quarter of a million dollars went toward salaries for two ICAN officers: Catharine Layton, the group’s chief administrative officer, was paid USD98,000. And Bigtree, who was previously unpaid by the charity, drew a salary of USD146,000.

    In a written response to questions from The Post, Bigtree said the compensation from ICAN is currently his only salary. He declined to answer questions about his relationship with the Selzes.

    “Like many charities, we receive funding from multiple sources and we do not discuss our donors or their donations as a matter of policy,” he wrote. “None of our donors make decisions on the science we research, or the lawsuits that we file.”

    ICAN also reported travel expenses exceeding USD148,000 in 2017. Bigtree frequently travels the country, speaking at wellness conferences and testifying before lawmakers considering vaccine-related legislation.

    At the height of a measles outbreak in Washington state in February, for example, Bigtree testified in Olympia against a measure intended to make it harder for parents to opt out of measles vaccinations for school-age children. The bill passed and was signed into law in April.

    In late April, Bigtree spoke in Salem, Oregon, at a rally against a bill aimed at getting more children vaccinated against measles and other preventable diseases. A day later, he led a similar protest in Sacramento.

    In a recent interview, Bigtree said he had discovered “this ability to be able to talk to legislators that I didn’t know I had.”

    Bigtree also produces a weekly online talk show broadcast through Facebook and other social media that has brought in new supporters. Among them are New York City real estate executive Stephen Benjamin and his wife, Elizabeth.

    The couple donated USD20,000 to ICAN in 2017 through their Will B Strong Foundation, named in honour of their son, a leukemia survivor. In an interview, Benjamin said he felt called to support ICAN’s efforts to raise questions about vaccine safety after watching Bigtree’s appearances online.

    “We feel strongly that this issue is not being handled well by the industry or our political leaders,” Benjamin said in an email. “Certainly what is happening right now – labeling minority groups and censoring opinion and discussion – is dangerous and un-American.”

    Bigtree’s appearances before ultra-Orthodox Jewish audiences in New York this spring, at the heart of the outbreak, have been particularly controversial. Some critics blasted his use of Holocaust imagery, including a yellow star of David he wore on his lapel during a March rally in Austin. Text and Photos by The Washington Post

    - Advertisement -

    Latest article

    - Advertisement -