‘Gossip Girl’ has always been about out-of-touch rich kids

Sonia Rao

THE WASHINGTON POST – During the first group outing of the new Gossip Girl reboot, a young man walks into a members-only establishment and sits next to his girlfriend, a social media influencer. He shares the Dan Humphrey-esque trait of being completely over whatever harebrained plans the wealthy teenagers may have, but projects his disdain with the confidence of someone who doesn’t doubt his place among the rest of them.

“If one-tenth of these people donated the price of one beverage to a charity of their choice – ” he begins, looking around at other patrons with names as luxurious as his own, Otto ‘Obie’ Bergmann IV.

“They are the charity of their choice, Obes,” his friend and high school classmate Max Wolfe cuts in, “and that is to help them forget what people like you ask of them”.

Obie’s girlfriend Julien Calloway (Jordan Alexander), identifies him earlier in the episode as the guiltiest of “the guilty rich”, a description to which Max (Thomas Doherty) adds, “And the richest.”

That Obie (Eli Brown) is the one to criticise reckless spending as the wealthiest member of the group is as rich as he is, but also emblematic of a central conundrum: How do you make a soapy television show about out-of-touch Upper East Siders for a generation said to be more socially conscious than ever before?

The cast of the Gossip Girl reboot. PHOTO: HBO MAX

The original Gossip Girl relished in opulence, the spoiled teenagers tossing couture brand names around as often as they rolled their eyes.

Their bank account balances were enviable; their lives and lack of morals not so much. The scandalous CW series came to recognise the limits of its storytelling, even adopting a tongue-in-cheek tone in the notorious marketing campaign pulling quotes from a negative review that referred to the show as “a nasty piece of work”.

The reboot is a more self-serious affair. Showrunner Josh Safran, who wrote for the original series years ago, told Variety the new characters would “wrestle with their privilege in a way that I think the original didn’t”.

In light of widespread protests last summer, he continued, and “even going back to Occupy Wall Street, things have shifted”.

In lieu of the power struggle between Blair and Serena van der Woodsen (Blake Lively), Gossip Girl stokes flames between newly acquainted half sisters Jordan and Zoya, who share a dead mother but not much else.

Even the Gossip Girl mantle has shifted hands, given that its progenitor, Dan (Penn Badgley), has grown and embarked on a more prestigious writing career. In the reboot, teachers from Constance Billard and St Jude’s, where the characters attend school, revive the secret-spilling website as an Instagram account and use it to distract and sow tension between their students, who apparently savour the challenge of banding together to get their instructors fired from already low-paying jobs for no good reason.

And so the show’s very premise hinges upon the teenagers willfully disregarding the financial security of their underpaid teachers, directly clashing with the promised wrestling with privilege. From the most cynical standpoint, even feigning interest in the labour issue at hand – or, at the very least, not causing it themselves – would better serve the aspiring and established influencers’ progressive brands (all while adding to the series a layer of timely commentary on performative behaviour online).

Of the wealthy characters, only Obie expresses concern over the casual cruelty with which his peers treat those who aren’t of their social stature – namely Kate Keller (Tavi Gevinson), the young teacher who bonds with Zoya, a scholarship student whose presumably middle-class family can only afford to live in New York because of her late grandmother’s rent-controlled apartment. Obie defends Keller against Julien’s derision but stops short of actually advocating for the teachers. Are we meant to be endeared to Obie simply because he exhibits a shred of empathy for those less wealthy, or does his passive nature make him nearly as bad as the others?

Not even the most thoughtful teenager is flawless, of course, and grey areas in characterisation can be a plus. But the reboot waffles with its approach to depicting the immensely wealthy, which lends to a faltering tone more than it does nuance. Whereas characters of the Blair and Serena era weren’t often intended to be sympathetic figures, new additions like Obie – and Julien, who tries to make up for her misdeeds as the season progresses – at times appear to be aiming for both admirable and aspirational. The loose grasp for social consciousness dulls whatever sharp points stand to be made about the richest of their generation.

There’s a certain level of ridiculousness viewers expect from Gossip Girl – especially given its CW origins – but the reboot seems keen on continuing down the self-serious path. With this in mind, it would do well to explore why it is Obie doesn’t believe he fits into the Upper East Side mold, interrogating his shortcomings as it does Julien’s self-centred behaviour or Max’s impulsive tendencies. Even the reboot’s most charitable teenager deserves less
charitable treatment.