Some Minneapolis activists doubt disbanding police will work

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — George Floyd’s death was the breaking point for some Minneapolis civic leaders, who now say the only way to fix the city’s embattled police department is to take it apart. But it is not clear how they would do that, and groups that have spent years shining a light on police brutality are not even sure it is the answer.

“We’re dismantling our police department,” City Council member Jeremiah Ellison tweeted on Sunday, the same day he and a majority of the council proclaimed support to disband the force to cheering protesters at a Minneapolis park. “And we won’t be silent. We’ll be loud. We’ll fight. We’ll win.”

But dismantling an entire department is exceedingly rare. It was done in Camden, New Jersey, and was talked about — though ultimately discarded — in Ferguson, Missouri, after the death of Michael Brown. Such a move comes with legal issues, including a city charter that stipulates a police force, plus a union-protected workforce.

“Saying that they’re going to defund the police or that they’re going to ban the police or whatever they’re talking about, that was optics, guys,” said Michelle Gross, president of the Minneapolis chapter of Communities United Against Police Brutality. “Just plain optics.”

Sam Martinez, an activist with Twin Cities Coalition for Justice for Jamar, a group formed after the 2015 death of Jamar Clark in a confrontation with police, said just getting rid of a police department doesn’t solve the problem.

City Council member Alondra Cano speaks during The Path Forward meeting at Powderhorn Park in Minneapolis. The focus of the meeting was the defunding of the Minneapolis Police Department. PHOTOS: AP
Community members at The Path Forward meeting

“If they attempted to defund the police or reduce the police force, we know they can’t do it, and what comes after that? Will they turn over the power to the (Hennepin County) sheriff … who has had no accountability either?” Martinez said.

Community activists criticised the Minneapolis department for years for what they said is a racist and brutal culture that resists change. The state of Minnesota launched a civil rights investigation of the department last week, and the first concrete changes came on Friday in a stipulated agreement in which the city agreed to ban chokeholds and neck restraints.

Steve Cramer, a former City Council member who now serves as president and CEO of the Minneapolis Downtown Council, called rhetoric about ending policing as the city knows it “exhilarating to some but terrifying to others”.

“Until we really understand how this kind of evaluation and planning process is going to move forward, there’s this vacuum that people are going to fill with their own thoughts,” he said. “I think that’s just a hard place that some of our elected officials have put our community in at a very vulnerable time.”

Protesters in the United States (US) are demanding police reforms, and calls to “defund the police” over the death of Floyd and other black Americans killed by law enforcement have become a rallying cry. Supporters said the movement is not about eliminating police departments or stripping agencies of all of their money. Instead, they said it is time for the country to address systemic problems in policing in America and spend more on what communities across the US need, such as housing and education.

Gross’ group, along with others including Minnesota’s Council on American-Islamic Relations and two Black Lives Matter chapters, presented their own 40 recommendations for police reform on Monday. They gathered at the remnants of the Third Precinct station, which was set ablaze by protesters at the height of violence following Floyd’s death.

Among the recommendations, officers would be required to carry their own professional liability insurance, an idea that aims to hike out-of-pocket insurance rates for officers who engage in high-risk conduct. Some of the worst offenders would become uninsurable and forbidden from working as a police officer.

The groups also are seeking an independent agency to investigate and prosecute critical incidents involving police; mandatory psychological testing for officers; and community participation in negotiating police union contracts. They would end so-called “warrior” training for officers and the use of no-knock warrants, while banning military equipment in community policing as well as neck restraints and chokeholds.

In Ferguson, where the 2014 shooting death of Brown, an unarmed 18-year-old, galvanised the fledgling Black Lives Matter movement, the city and US Justice Department entered a consent agreement that required massive reforms overseen by a court-appointed monitor. Among the results are a department with significantly more black officers, a police use-of-force policy and progress in use of body-worn and in-car cameras.

Ferguson spent USD1.1 million in the first three years of the consent agreement and expects to spend another USD1 million over the next three years — a significant investment for a city with an annual budget of less than USD13 million.

Changes are being talked about elsewhere, too. In New York City, Mayor Bill de Blasio said on Sunday the city would move funding from the NYPD to youth initiatives and social services, while keeping the city safe, but he did not give details. In Los Angeles, Mayor Eric Garcetti vowed to cut as much as USD150 million that was part of a planned increase in the police department’s budget.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who was booed at a rally on Saturday outside his house when he said he does not support abolishing the department, repeated that stance on Monday. In an interview with ABC’s Good Morning America, he said he looked forward to “deciphering” what council members mean by such talk.

He said he favoured “a full-on cultural shift in how our Minneapolis Police Department and departments throughout the country function”.

“We have difficulty both terminating and disciplining officers, and then getting that termination or discipline to stick,” Frey said. “We’re going after the police union, the police union contract, the arbitration provisions that mandate that we have arbitration at the end of the process, and oftentimes that reverts the officer to right back where they were to begin with.”

Alondra Cano, one of the nine council members who said they support disbanding, called impending change “a process” that is just beginning. Meanwhile, she said the council will look at redirecting funding from the police department toward the city’s office of violence prevention and other community safety strategies that will “help inform and bring life to that new public safety system that we all want to create”.

Ellison said the city will continue to fund safety initiatives like the Group Violence Intervention programme, which started in 2017 with the aim of reducing gun violence.

“I think that we owe it to ourselves as a community to sort of put our resources behind those things that we already know are working,” Ellison said. “But we are not going to hit the eject button without a fully realised plan.”